Peer-Review Policy

All submissions to KJDM undergo a double-blind peer-review process. Each manuscript is reviewed by three subject-matter experts. Reviewer feedback is collectively evaluated to determine acceptance, revision, or rejection. The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision, which may be informed by consultation with advisory board members. Associate Editors and Review Editors provide administrative support to ensure the integrity and transparency of the review process. If authors contest a rejection with valid justification, the manuscript may be referred to an additional reviewer, and the final decision will be based on their recommendation.